The irresistible scream of mutual respect
Re: “Multiculturalism is a sham” | Commentary | November 23
Madison Smith - Media Credits
STOP! No more research! This guy says it’s a bad idea
Re: “Grow your own building” | Sci+Tech | January 25
If mealtimes are a struggle, don’t face it alone
McGill’s Eating Disorder Program marks its first Awareness Week
Citius, deterius, fortius
Olympic fever is picking up, and it’s astonishing how many large Canadian institutions carry the official stamp of the Games, from Canada Post to Coca… Read More »Citius, deterius, fortius
Montreal hosts Haiti aid talks
Activists decry militarization, profiteering, and political exclusion
Pierogies and pleasantries in Mile End
Conversations about Polish food involving me usually go something like this. Friend: Would you like a pierogie? Me: Ooh, I’ve never had one of those… Read More »Pierogies and pleasantries in Mile End
A lesson in anatomy and pleasure
The Daily’s sex columnists visit a sex toy expert
Tricks of the lens
Exhibition stages Loch Ness photos to expose the unreliability of the photographic medium
The public editor returns
Controversies, race theory, and The horny Daily
Town halls a sham unless backed by more than rhetoric
A s part of a purported initiative to increase the McGill community’s involvement in university affairs, the Principal’s Task Force on Diversity, Excellence, and Community… Read More »Town halls a sham unless backed by more than rhetoric
Where the TAs at?
Funding dries up, students hung out to dry
A moment of silence
Pausing for remembrance is not a waste of time
Needed: identity, appearance safeguards
Trans protections are important for more than just trans people
Errata
The illustration for the article “PGSS to debate CFS referendum” (News, January 21) was credited to Jerry Wu. The article was in fact illustrated by… Read More »Errata
Rejecting a regurgitative science
I have not braved a single course in biology since high school – I am terrible at memorization – but I remember the initial experiments… Read More »Rejecting a regurgitative science